Frameworks explained
GRI vs VSME vs ESRS
Three standards you keep hearing, three very different things — plus the CSRD, the EU law that makes one of them compulsory. We have split the full comparison into two focused pages; pick the question you are actually asking.
GRI vs VSME
Both voluntary — but very different in depth. What each standard is, who each is built for, and the pros and cons of choosing one over the other.
For SMEs weighing credibility against effort.
Read the comparison →
GRI vs ESRS
One voluntary and global, one mandatory and European. What each standard is, who each is built for, and the pros and cons of reporting under one over the other.
For companies facing — or watching — the CSRD.
Read the comparison →
How deep does each one go?
Roughly, from most demanding to lightest — though depth is not the same as fit.
01ESRS
Deepest — and compulsory
Fixed disclosure requirements you cannot opt out of, double materiality, value-chain data and external assurance — for the companies the CSRD puts in scope.
02GRI Standards
Broadest library
The largest set of topic and sector standards, and the widest global recognition — but voluntary, so how deep your report goes is partly your own choice.
03VSME
Deliberately thinnest
Eleven disclosures in the basic module and nine more in the comprehensive one — built so a small firm can finish it in days, not weeks.
Deeper is not automatically better: ESRS only matters if you are in CSRD scope, GRI is what buyers and lenders outside the EU recognise, and VSME answers a bank questionnaire fastest.
Not sure where to start?
We help businesses pick the right framework and build a report that holds up — without over-engineering it. Start with the free readiness checklist, or get in touch.